Players from Pennsylvania Suing DraftKings
Five men from Pennsylvania have decided to sue DraftKings for hundreds of thousands of dollars lost due to gambling. One of the plaintiffs is a teacher who allegedly lost more than $130K, while another player lost more than $350K – in spite of applying for self-exclusion. Five men from Pennsylvania are suing online sports betting company DraftKings, claiming the platform used predatory tactics and misleading promotions to exploit their gambling addictions and drain them of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The federal lawsuit, filed in late April, accuses DraftKings of targeting vulnerable users with deceptive marketing and intentionally vague terms and conditions. According to the complaint, the men - one of whom is a public school teacher - were systematically manipulated by a platform designed to keep compulsive gamblers engaged, despite their efforts to stop. They are seeking to launch a class action lawsuit, potentially opening the door for other similarly affected bettors to join the case. Promotions mask deceptive fine print, lawsuit says The lawsuit takes aim at the way DraftKings advertises its promotional offers. Common deals like deposit matches or “no sweat” bets are touted as risk-free, but are allegedly packed with complicated and hard-to-find terms that limit their actual value. “DraftKings uses these tactics to identify and cultivate the people it wants on its platform: those who are most susceptible to these sorts of promotions and most likely to lose a lot of money betting,” reads the complaint. “In other words, marks.” The plaintiffs argue that the platform does not act to protect users showing signs of gambling addiction, but instead exploits them for profit. The lawsuit also criticizes DraftKings for failing to honor user requests for self-exclusion, a tool meant to help compulsive gamblers restrict their own access. Personal stories highlight devastating losses Among the plaintiffs is a Pittsburgh teacher earning roughly $50,000 a year, who lost $134,000 on the DraftKings platform. The lawsuit says he drained his bank account and borrowed heavily from friends and family in order to continue gambling. Another plaintiff from Allentown reportedly attempted to self-exclude after recognizing his gambling addiction. But despite his request, he regained access to his account and proceeded to lose over $350,000. The complaint states that the man now suffers from anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, in addition to having lost friends and employment. A third man, even after placing himself on Pennsylvania’s official self-exclusion list - a state-run registry that should prevent access to gambling platforms - continued to gamble on the app, suggesting that DraftKings failed to comply with the state’s safeguards. Lawsuit reflects growing scrutiny of online sportsbooks The lawsuit comes at a time when online sports betting platforms have surged in popularity across the United States, following a 2018 US Supreme Court decision that overturned a federal ban and allowed states to legalize sports betting. In Pennsylvania, DraftKings operates through a partnership with Hollywood Casino and ranks as the state’s second-largest sportsbook by revenue. The company also owns an online casino. The plaintiffs are represented by Loevy + Loevy, a Chicago-based civil rights law firm that has filed similar suits against DraftKings in other states, including New Jersey, Illinois, New York, and Kentucky. As of May 20, DraftKings had not filed a legal response to the Pennsylvania lawsuit, and company representatives did not respond to media requests for comment. If granted class action status, the lawsuit could have wide implications for how online sportsbooks are regulated, especially in their handling of vulnerable users. It could also pressure companies like DraftKings to implement stronger safeguards for problem gamblers and improve transparency in their promotional strategies. For now, the plaintiffs hope the lawsuit will bring accountability - and relief - to others who have faced similar financial and emotional harm at the hands of online gambling platforms.